ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Eculizumab withdrawal and monitoring in atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (SETS aHUS): a multicentre, open label, prospective, single arm trial.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Complement-amplified thrombotic microangiopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: a systematic review of 78 reported patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Therapeutics Beyond Delivery: Repurposed Drugs and Biologic Pathways.Current hypertension reports · 2026Review
- Complement inhibitor therapy in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS): evaluating the economic impact of introducing eculizumab biosimilars in Germany.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Thrombotic microangiopathy after kidney transplantation: diagnosis and management strategies.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Clinical and cost-effectiveness of eculizumab withdrawal in atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: the SETS aHUS multi-centre, open-label, prospective and single-arm study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of lifelong eculizumab versus disease monitoring of aHUS.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2026Article
- Research Gaps and Priorities for aHUS in the Gulf Cooperation Countries (GCC): Findings from a Payer-Focused Expert Meeting.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Which Factors Influence Decisions to Withdraw from Eculizumab: A Qualitative Study of Patients Diagnosed with aHUS.The patient · 2026Article
- Complement diagnostics and therapeutics for the pediatric population: early successes and opportunities for further advancement.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atypical Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome is a rare disease, associated with high morbidity and mortality. Eculizumab, a monoclonal complement inhibitor, is an effective treatment but the optimal way to use this high-cost medication has not been determined. The SETS aHUS trial aimed to establish the safety of eculizumab withdrawal and the effectiveness of a monitoring protocol to detect disease relapse and reintroduction of treatment if relapse occurs. Methods: The SETS aHUS multicentre, open label, prospective, single-arm trial enrolled participants from 15 UK hospitals. Patients over two years of age with aHUS who were receiving eculizumab therapy for at least six months were eligible to withdraw from treatment, replacing it with monitoring to assess disease activity and treatment re-introduction if relapse occurred. The primary outcome measure was harm to a participant as a consequence of eculizumab withdrawal. Participants met a primary outcome if there was a permanent reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate, requirement for kidney replacement therapy or significant extra-renal manifestation of disease. The Bayes factor single arm binary model was used to monitor and analyse the trial data, applying pre-trial stopping rules. The trial is registered with the European Union Drug Regulating Authority (EudraCT 2017-003916-37) and is closed for recruitment. Findings: One of 28 participants (3.6%) who withdrew from treatment met a primary outcome. Four of the 28 participants (14.3%) relapsed. Only participants with an identified cause of complement dysregulation relapsed. It was possible, by monitoring and rapid participant access, to reintroduce eculizumab treatment. Based on the pre-trial analysis plan, withdrawal from treatment may represent no greater risk to patients. Interpretation: In this single arm study, for patients fulfilling trial entry criteria, which excluded some high-risk patients, withdrawal of eculizumab treatment with monitoring of disease activity was not associated with an increased risk of harm compared to continuation of eculizumab. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.