ReviewJournal of diabetes and metabolic disorders2026
Strategies for the management of gestational diabetes mellitus from the perspective of stakeholders: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.
Review in Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Engagement Strategies for Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Low-Resource Community Health Settings: A Narrative Review and Clinical Principles.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparative effects of psychological interventions (PRECEDE, PLISSIT, BETTER, and Counseling) on female sexual function index (FSFI) scores in women with diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2026Review
- A longitudinal qualitative study on the experiences and needs of women with gestational diabetes regarding blood glucose management using a journey map.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is prevalent during pregnancy. While clinical guidelines exist, implementation challenges persist due to limited understanding of stakeholder perspectives, including those of women with GDM, their families, and healthcare providers (HCPs). The aim of this study was to synthesize qualitative evidence on stakeholder experiences, barriers, facilitators, and strategies for effective GDM management. Methods: A systematic review and thematic meta-synthesis was conducted following PRISMA and ENTREQ guidelines. Databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science) and gray literature were searched from their inception to August 31, 2025. Eligibility was defined using the SPIDER framework, focusing on qualitative studies exploring GDM management perspectives. Studies were appraised using the CASP checklist. Data were extracted systematically, and synthesized thematically using NVivo software, following the Thomas and Harden's approach. The review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251161631). Results: From 1,500 + screened records, 48 studies were included, involving diverse global populations. Four overarching themes emerged: (1) Patient-Centered Education and Support, emphasizing tailored information, emotional support, and motivation to address knowledge gaps and stigma; (2) Collaborative Care and Family Involvement, highlighting interdisciplinary coordination, partner engagement, and community networks; (3) Practical Lifestyle and Self-Management Strategies, focusing on dietary adjustments, physical activity, self-monitoring, and postpartum care continuity; and (4) Systemic and Technological Innovations, advocating for improved care delivery, digital tools, and equity to mitigate barriers. A conceptual model integrates these themes into a holistic framework for GDM care. Conclusions: This synthesis underscores the need for patient-centered, culturally sensitive strategies integrating individual, interpersonal, and systemic elements to enhance GDM management. Findings can inform clinical practice, policy development, and future interventions to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes and prevent long-term complications like type 2 diabetes. Trial registration: Not applicable. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-025-01848-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.