ArticleNagoya journal of medical science2025
A new understanding of the mechanical mechanism of posterior vaginal prolapse based on magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the theory of force translation, the mechanical mechanism underlying posterior vaginal prolapse (PVP) can be speculated upon by measuring the displacement of the pelvic floor supporting structures with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Displacement of the posterior vaginal vault (Vp), the square root of the area under the curve between the sacrococcygeal inferior pubic point line (SCIPP) and the middle third of the posterior vaginal wall (PVW) (Sc'), the midperineal body (mid-PB), the H line, the M line, the estimated levator ani subtended volume (eLASV) and the levator hiatus width (LHW) were measured while participants performed during the Valsalva maneuver on MR images. These measurements were evaluated at different stages of PVP (n = 10, 12, 9, and 17 for stages 0, I, II, and ≥ III, respectively) with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the displacement difference ratio was used to describe the distribution process of force transfer. In Phase 1, the displacement difference ratios of Vp and Sc' far exceeded those of mid-PB and eLASV; in Phase 2, the displacement difference ratio of eLASV increased significantly to more than ten times that of in Phase 1, whereas the displacement difference ratio of the mid-PB was unchanged; in Phase 3, the mid-PB displacement difference ratio increased by nearly 33 times that in Phase 2. Specific interactions between the pelvic floor muscles and connective tissues may occur during the course of PVW prolapse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.