Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550184›Full record

ReviewNagoya journal of medical science2025

Reconsidering psychological safety from the perspective of personality organization levels.

Rieko Fujie, Nobutaro Ban

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rieko FujieSchool of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Nobutaro BanMedical Education Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical education, psychological safety in teams and organizations facilitates problem solving in healthcare teams and learning opportunities for learners. Based on four types of organizational climate, this study examines the interventions needed for each type of team and organization to increase psychological safety and create an environment in which learners can learn independently and effectively. In considering interventions, the concept of three levels of personality organization, a framework for psychological assessment, seems to be valuable. Based on the overlap between the four types of organizational climate and the three levels of personality organization, the "Apathy Zone" requires educators and learners to reestablish autonomy rooted in reality. In the "Anxiety Zone," the challenge is for educators to recognize their own limitations and be willing to understand learners. In the "Comfort Zone," educators must respect learners' autonomy while observing norms. Both educators and learners must distinguish between the realms of self and others, focusing on essential goals. The "Learning Zone" requires educators and learners to move without overthinking to achieve essential goals. The psychological perspective provides guidance for understanding the formation of organizational climate and considering specific interventions.

Indexed as

PersonalityPsychological SafetyHumansLearningOrganizational Cultureorganizational climatepersonality organization levelspsychological safety

Identifiers

PMID41550184
PMCPMC12805134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.