Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550151›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutical science advances2024

Biowaiver based on biopharmaceutics classification system: Considerations and requirements.

Pratik R Dhake, Smita T Kumbhar, Vinod L Gaikwad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutical science advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pratik R DhakeDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hajipur, 844 102, Bihar, India.
Smita T KumbharDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, DSTS Mandal's College of Pharmacy, Solapur- 413 004, Maharashtra, India.
Vinod L GaikwadDepartment of Pharmaceutics, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Hajipur, 844 102, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biowaiver allows for the waiver of bioequivalence studies for regulatory approval of certain drug products with saving of time, and money. Before approval of the application for biowaivers, studies based on the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) are required to satisfy regulators in the US, Europe, and other developing markets. Only pharmaceutical products that meet the regulatory requirements for solubility, diffusion, and permeability will be granted a biowaiver. Due to high solubility and considerable permeability, BCS class I and class III drugs are highly preferred for biowaiver by regulatory agencies. The World Health Organization recently expanded the scope of the biowaiver acceptance by considering all BCS classes. These techniques can cut down on time and money spent on ineffective bioequivalence studies. In the present article, an attempt has been made to cover the prerequisites and guidelines for biowaiver approval of a generic product, a topical system, oral films, and BCS class II and IV drugs.

Indexed as

BioequivalentBiopharmaceutics classification systemBiowaiverGenericsPermeabilitySolubility

Identifiers

PMID41550151
PMCPMC12709982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.