Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550110›Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2026

Surgical Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Retrospective Review of Six Cases with a Focus on the Sharon Operation.

Keisuke Inoue, Tetsu Yamamoto, Takahito Taniura, Kazunari Ishitobi, Ayana Kishimoto, Shunsuke Kaji, Takayuki Tanaka, Takeshi Matsubara, Masaaki Hidaka

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Keisuke InoueDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Tetsu YamamotoDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Takahito TaniuraDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Kazunari IshitobiDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Ayana KishimotoDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Shunsuke KajiDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Takayuki TanakaDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Takeshi MatsubaraDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.
Masaaki HidakaDepartment of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSigmoid volvulus is a clinically significant cause of large bowel obstruction that occurs particularly in older patients with a reduced physical function. Although endoscopic detorsion is the first-line treatment, volvulus recurrence is common and often requires elective surgery. Despite various reports on the surgical procedures, the optimal approach remains controversial. The Sharon operation, first introduced in 1985, is a minimally invasive technique that avoids mobilization of the sigmoid colon via a small incision in the left lower quadrant. Although it offers several advantages, such as shorter operative time, minimal invasiveness, and favorable clinical outcomes, it remains underutilized, especially in Japan. We evaluated the clinical utility and indications of the Sharon operation in high-risk patients with recurrent sigmoid volvulus. CASE PRESENTATION: This retrospective study analyzed 6 patients who underwent surgery for sigmoid volvulus at our institution between 2015 and 2023. The median age was 82.5 years, and all patients had a prior history of volvulus. Four patients underwent elective surgery following successful endoscopic detorsion, and 2 underwent emergency surgery due to suspected bowel necrosis. Among the elective cases, 2 received laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and 2 underwent the Sharon operation. The Sharon operation group had a shorter operative time (mean 74 min) than the laparoscopic surgery group (mean 225.5 min), with minimal blood loss in both groups. The only postoperative complication was superficial surgical site infection (SSI) in 1 laparoscopic case. During a median follow-up period of 61 months, no recurrence was observed. We chose the Sharon operation preferentially for patients with advanced age, poor nutritional status, or severe comorbidities including cardiac dysfunction.

conclusionsThe Sharon operation is a safe and effective option for recurrent sigmoid volvulus, particularly in older patients or those with significant comorbidities. Considering its shorter operative time and minimal incision, it may be helpful in patients who are unsuitable for standard laparoscopic or open procedures. No recurrence was observed during long-term follow-up, suggesting a potentially curative outcome of the Sharon operation.

Indexed as

elective colectomyminimally invasive surgeryolder patientsSharon operationsigmoid volvulus

Identifiers

PMID41550110
PMCPMC12804092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.