ArticleSurgical case reports2026
Surgical Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Retrospective Review of Six Cases with a Focus on the Sharon Operation.
Article in Surgical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trans-Pfannenstiel sigmoidectomy for sigmoid volvulus: description of a novel surgical technique and initial experience from a retrospective case series.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Sharon Operation under Spinal Anesthesia for Recurrent Sigmoid Volvulus: A Letter to the Editor.Surgical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSigmoid volvulus is a clinically significant cause of large bowel obstruction that occurs particularly in older patients with a reduced physical function. Although endoscopic detorsion is the first-line treatment, volvulus recurrence is common and often requires elective surgery. Despite various reports on the surgical procedures, the optimal approach remains controversial. The Sharon operation, first introduced in 1985, is a minimally invasive technique that avoids mobilization of the sigmoid colon via a small incision in the left lower quadrant. Although it offers several advantages, such as shorter operative time, minimal invasiveness, and favorable clinical outcomes, it remains underutilized, especially in Japan. We evaluated the clinical utility and indications of the Sharon operation in high-risk patients with recurrent sigmoid volvulus. CASE PRESENTATION: This retrospective study analyzed 6 patients who underwent surgery for sigmoid volvulus at our institution between 2015 and 2023. The median age was 82.5 years, and all patients had a prior history of volvulus. Four patients underwent elective surgery following successful endoscopic detorsion, and 2 underwent emergency surgery due to suspected bowel necrosis. Among the elective cases, 2 received laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and 2 underwent the Sharon operation. The Sharon operation group had a shorter operative time (mean 74 min) than the laparoscopic surgery group (mean 225.5 min), with minimal blood loss in both groups. The only postoperative complication was superficial surgical site infection (SSI) in 1 laparoscopic case. During a median follow-up period of 61 months, no recurrence was observed. We chose the Sharon operation preferentially for patients with advanced age, poor nutritional status, or severe comorbidities including cardiac dysfunction.
conclusionsThe Sharon operation is a safe and effective option for recurrent sigmoid volvulus, particularly in older patients or those with significant comorbidities. Considering its shorter operative time and minimal incision, it may be helpful in patients who are unsuitable for standard laparoscopic or open procedures. No recurrence was observed during long-term follow-up, suggesting a potentially curative outcome of the Sharon operation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.