Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41550099›Full record

ArticleAnimal welfare (South Mimms, England)2026

Influence of group size on performance and tail biting in growing-finishing pigs with intact tails.

Courtney Archer, Storey Forster, Adrienne Hilbrands, Ty Schmidt, Benny Mote, Lee Johnston, Yuzhi Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal welfare (South Mimms, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Courtney ArcherAnimal Science, University of Minnesota, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1601-854X
Storey ForsterAnimal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, United States.
Adrienne HilbrandsWest Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, United States.
Ty SchmidtAnimal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, United States.
Benny MoteAnimal Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, United States.
Lee JohnstonAnimal Science, University of Minnesota, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, United States.
Yuzhi LiAnimal Science, University of Minnesota, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of group size on tail damage and growth performance in growing-finishing pigs with intact tails. A total of 432 pigs were housed indoors on fully-slatted floors and assigned to either small (nine pigs per pen) or large (18 pigs per pen) groups, with equal space and resource allocation per pig. No environmental enrichment was provided. From nine to 23 weeks of age, pigs were monitored weekly for tail injuries using a 5-point scale (0 = no injury, 4 = partial or total loss). The most severe score observed during each four-week period was used for analysis, and outbreaks were defined as the occurrence of one or more pigs per pen with a tail score ≥ 2. Group size did not influence average daily gain, feed intake, or feed to gain ratio. However, pigs housed in small groups experienced more frequent and severe tail injuries, including a higher proportion of removals due to tail wounds. In contrast, pigs in large groups were more likely to receive healed tail scores (score 1) or mild injuries (score 2), and experienced fewer removals. While these results suggest that tail damage may be less severe in larger groups, the total number of pigs affected by tail biting was similar across treatments. These findings highlight the importance of managing tail-damage severity and suggest that group size can influence welfare outcomes in systems where pigs are raised with intact tails.

Indexed as

Animal welfaregroup dynamicsmanagementseverityswine welfaretail damagetail injury

Identifiers

PMID41550099
PMCPMC12805191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.