ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
The clinical efficacy of novel semirigid ureteroscopy with a vacuum suction device for treatment of >10 mm upper ureteral stones and impacted calculus: implications for clinical practice.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction of Clavien-Dindo ≥ II complications after ureteroscopy.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The novel semirigid ureteroscopy with a vacuum suction device has been increasing in the treatment of urinary stones recently. This study aimed to evaluate its clinical efficacy for treating >10 mm upper ureteral stones and impacted calculus and to further assess the efficacy by using a vacuum suction device during lithotripsy procedures. Patients and methods: This study included 156 patients with >10 mm upper ureteral calculi who underwent laser lithotripsy under the novel semirigid ureteroscopy with a vacuum suction device. The vacuum suction device and the end of the ureteral access sheath (UAS) were joined together to create a closed circulation working channel between the former and the collection system. This circulation working channel allows the operator to suction stone fragments out of the body during lithotripsy. Based on impacted and non-impacted upper ureteral stones, subgroup analysis was performed. Results: Of the 156 patients, 150 underwent successful phase I ureteral sheath placement and lithotripsy. 6 patients were unsuccessfully placed for UAS because of upper ureteral stenosis, but all of them received indwelling Double-J tubes for one month and then underwent successful second-stage lithotripsy. The average operative time was 43.8 ± 25.7 min. The stone-free rate (SFR) was 57.7% (90/156) at 1 day postoperatively, and 87.8% (137/156) at 1 month postoperatively. The rate of complications was 9.0% (14/156). In subgroup analysis, for the impacted stone group, the average operative time was 48.0 ± 29.3 min. The SFR was 54.8% (46/84) at 1 day postoperatively, and 88.1% (74/84) at 1 month postoperatively. The rate of complications was 10.7% (9/84). Conclusion: For the treatment of >10 mm upper ureteral stones and impacted calculus, the novel semirigid ureteroscopy with a vacuum suction device is safe and effective. During the lithotripsy procedure, the use of a vacuum suction device has the potential to improve stone removal efficiency. However, due to the critical limitation of the lack of integrated pressure monitoring and control devices, potential complications caused by negative pressure suction and perfusion flow imbalance should be watched out for.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.