ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2026
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antibiotic treatment for respiratory tract infections in Norwegian primary care.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of macrolides, specifically azithromycin, for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in primary care increased in several countries. In Norway, antibiotic treatment of COVID-19 was never recommended.
objectivesTo investigate the antibiotic treatment for RTIs in Norwegian primary care, comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic periods.
methodsWe defined RTI episodes and antibiotic treatment using several national registries including demographic and residency data from Statistics Norway, reimbursement claims from the Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care, antibiotic dispensing from the Norwegian Prescription Database, and deaths from the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, for the years 2018-2021.
resultsApproximately 80% of the 4 904 376 total RTI episodes during the study period were handled exclusively in daytime general practice (DGP). Use of electronic consultations for RTI episodes increased from less than 1% to more than 50%. Throughout the study period, most RTI episodes were handled without antibiotic use. The antibiotic treatment rate for RTI episodes dropped during the pandemic, relative risk (RR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.52-0.52, compared to pre-pandemic. Over half of all antibiotic treatments for RTIs were phenoxymethylpenicillin, and the distribution of antibiotic types was relatively stable during the study period, except for some temporary changes in the initial months of the pandemic. DGP handled most of the influx of RTIs during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic in primary care, without increasing antibiotic use.
conclusionsDGP
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.