Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41549920›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2026

Hazard-based distributional regression via ordinary differential equations.

Jose A Christen, Francisco J Rubio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jose A ChristenDepartment of Statistics, Centre for Research in Mathematics (CIMAT), Guanajuato, Mexico.
Francisco J RubioDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7183-8407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hazard function is central to the formulation of commonly used survival regression models such as the proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models. However, these models rely on a shared baseline hazard, which, when specified parametrically, can only capture limited shapes. To overcome this limitation, we propose a general class of parametric survival regression models obtained by modelling the hazard function using autonomous systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs). Covariate information is incorporated via transformed linear predictors on the parameters of the ODE system. Our framework capitalises on the interpretability of parameters in common ODE systems, enabling the identification of covariate values that produce qualitatively distinct hazard shapes associated with different attractors of the system of ODEs. This provides deeper insights into how covariates influence survival dynamics. We develop efficient Bayesian computational tools, including parallelised evaluation of the log-posterior, which facilitates integration with general-purpose Markov Chain Monte Carlo samplers. We also derive conditions for posterior asymptotic normality, enabling fast approximations of the posterior. A central contribution of our work lies in the case studies. We demonstrate the methodology using clinical trial data with crossing survival curves, and a study of cancer recurrence times where our approach reveals how the efficacy of interventions (treatments) on hazard and survival are influenced by patient characteristics.

Indexed as

Proportional Hazards ModelsBayes TheoremHumansMarkov ChainsMonte Carlo MethodNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRegression AnalysisSurvival AnalysisDistributional regressionhazard functionordinary differential equationsordinary differential equation solversurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41549920
PMCPMC13047225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.