ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Ergonomic advantages of the open console system in robotic colorectal resection: reduced musculoskeletal strain with preserved technical performance - a post hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Surgeon task load, ergonomics, and clinical outcomes in laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- First United States experience of robotic-assisted minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair using the Dexter surgical system.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Medicolegal aspects of robotic-assisted surgery: litigation trends, complication risks, and human factors interventions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough robotic surgery has advanced minimally invasive techniques, its ergonomic limitations pose significant musculoskeletal risks to surgeons. This study evaluated whether the Kangduo SR-01 (KD) open console system mitigates intraoperative ergonomic strain while preserving technical performance during robotic colorectal resection.
methodsThis study utilized data from a multicenter randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing the efficacy and safety of KD versus Da Vinci (DV) robotic systems in assisting colorectal cancer resection. The assessment framework included ergonomic strain (Borg CR-10 Scale), team coordination (Oxford NOTECHS II), and blinded video-based technical performance analysis [Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS)].
resultsA total of 100 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 50 in the KD group and 50 in the DV group. Body mass index (BMI) and resection types were comparable between groups. Postural demands were significantly higher for neck and back during DV procedures. Discomfort increased significantly more over time (up to 3 h) in the DV group for both neck [MD (95% c.i.) -0.889 (-1.077, -0.701), P < 0.001] and back [MD (95% c.i.) -0.606 (-0.847, -0.364), P < 0.001]. Notably, both systems achieved equivalent technical proficiency (OSATS total: 29.0 vs. 29.0, P = 0.259) and team coordination (NOTECHS II: 74.0 vs. 73.0, P = 0.120) with comparable short-term outcomes.
conclusionsThe Kangduo SR-01 open console system significantly alleviated musculoskeletal strain, particularly in the neck and back, during robotic colorectal surgery while maintaining equivalent technical performance. These findings position open console platforms as a viable solution to ergonomic challenges in robotic surgery without compromising team dynamics or procedural efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.