ArticleSmall methods2026
Machine Learning-Driven Nanopore Sensing for Quantitative, Label-Free miRNA Detection.
Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Threading Precision: Progress and Emerging Trends in Aptamer-Based Nanopore Sensing.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanopore sensors offer exceptional sensitivity for detecting single molecules, making them ideal for early disease diagnostics. In this study, we present a multiplexed nanopore-based assay that combines DNA-barcoded probes with advanced computational analysis to detect microRNAs (miRNAs) with high specificity and accuracy. Each probe selectively binds its target biomarker and induces a characteristic delay in the ionic current signal upon translocation through the nanopore. We evaluated three analytical strategies for classifying delayed versus non-delayed events: (1) moving standard deviation (MSD), (2) spectral entropy (SE), and (3) a convolutional neural network (CNN). While MSD and SE rely on manually defined thresholds and exhibit limited sensitivity, the CNN model, trained on image representations of raw current traces, achieved near-perfect classification performance across all metrics (accuracy = 0.99, precision = 0.99, recall = 0.99). Grad-CAM visualization confirmed that the CNN model focused on relevant signal regions, enhancing interpretability and generalizability. All methods produced sigmoidal concentration-response curves consistent with expected binding kinetics, and nanopore-derived delay metrics closely matched RT-qPCR validation data. All three methods were capable of distinguishing between signal classes; however, the CNN model demonstrated superior sensitivity and robustness. This work highlights the importance of data interpretation in nanopore sensing and presents a comparative framework for binary event classification. The findings pave the way for the development of machine learning-driven nanopore diagnostics capable of detecting diverse biomarker types at the single-molecule level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.