Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41549838›Full record

ArticleSmall methods2026

Machine Learning-Driven Nanopore Sensing for Quantitative, Label-Free miRNA Detection.

Caroline Koch, Seshagiri Sakthimani, Victoria Maria Noakes, Miruna Cretu, David Newman, Richard Gutierrez, Mark Bruce, Julia Gorelik, Nadia Guerra, Joshua B Edel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Caroline KochDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Science Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Seshagiri SakthimaniDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Science Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8268-2185
Victoria Maria NoakesDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Science Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Miruna CretuDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Science Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK.
David NewmanOxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK.
Richard GutierrezOxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK.
Mark BruceOxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK.
Julia GorelikNational Heart and Lung Institute, ICTEM, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1148-9158
Nadia GuerraDepartment of Life Science, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-1241
Joshua B EdelDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Science Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5870-8659
Aleksandar P IvanovDepartment of Chemistry, Molecular Science Research Hub, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-1381

Funding

Analytical Chemistry Trust Fund 600322/05Cancer Research Institute CRI5416H2020 European Research Council 724300H2020 European Research Council 875525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanopore sensors offer exceptional sensitivity for detecting single molecules, making them ideal for early disease diagnostics. In this study, we present a multiplexed nanopore-based assay that combines DNA-barcoded probes with advanced computational analysis to detect microRNAs (miRNAs) with high specificity and accuracy. Each probe selectively binds its target biomarker and induces a characteristic delay in the ionic current signal upon translocation through the nanopore. We evaluated three analytical strategies for classifying delayed versus non-delayed events: (1) moving standard deviation (MSD), (2) spectral entropy (SE), and (3) a convolutional neural network (CNN). While MSD and SE rely on manually defined thresholds and exhibit limited sensitivity, the CNN model, trained on image representations of raw current traces, achieved near-perfect classification performance across all metrics (accuracy = 0.99, precision = 0.99, recall = 0.99). Grad-CAM visualization confirmed that the CNN model focused on relevant signal regions, enhancing interpretability and generalizability. All methods produced sigmoidal concentration-response curves consistent with expected binding kinetics, and nanopore-derived delay metrics closely matched RT-qPCR validation data. All three methods were capable of distinguishing between signal classes; however, the CNN model demonstrated superior sensitivity and robustness. This work highlights the importance of data interpretation in nanopore sensing and presents a comparative framework for binary event classification. The findings pave the way for the development of machine learning-driven nanopore diagnostics capable of detecting diverse biomarker types at the single-molecule level.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMachine LearningMicroRNAsNanoporesConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansMicroRNAsbiomarkerdata‐analysismachine‐learningmiRNAsnanopores

Identifiers

PMID41549838
PMCPMC12929938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.