Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41549680›Full record

ArticleScience progress

AI-driven patient-centered care: A digital transformation framework for gynecologic cancer genetic counseling.

Ruiye Yang, Xiaoran Zheng, Yaoqi Deng, Mengqi Deng, Junyi Jiang, Jinwei Miao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruiye YangDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0009-0008-5475-5739
Xiaoran ZhengDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Handan Fukang Hospital, Hebei, China.
Yaoqi DengDepartment of Educational Management, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, China.
Mengqi DengDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1710-0094
Junyi JiangState Key Laboratory of Medical Proteomics, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, China.
Jinwei MiaoDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2759-7826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study evaluates artificial intelligence (AI) reasoning capabilities in gynecologic cancer genetic counseling, comparing the performance of ChatGPT and DeepSeek models to guide patient-centered AI implementation in clinical genetics.MethodsUsing 40 National Comprehensive Cancer Network-aligned counseling scenarios, we conducted blinded dual-oncologist evaluations of two large language models. Methodological rigor included model anonymization, a pre-calibrated scoring framework, and validated metrics (Global Quality Scale and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool) assessing informational coherence, understandability, and actionability.ResultsDeepSeek demonstrated superior informational breadth (mean character difference: -609.0,

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGenetic CounselingGenital Neoplasms, FemalePatient-Centered CareFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language ModelsArtificial intelligencedigital health transformationgenetic counselinggynecologic cancerpatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID41549680
PMCPMC12816523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.