Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41549621›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Engaging Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Communities to Prepare for Lung Cancer Screening Implementation in Australia: A Qualitative Focus Group Study.

Tescha Nicholls, Sarah York, Nathan J Harrison, Georgia Bartlett, John Paul Troiani, Biljana Stanoevska, Mei Ling Yap, Joel Rhee, Rachael H Dodd, Henry M Marshall and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Engaging Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Communities to Prepare for Lung Cancer Screening Implementation in Australia: A Qualitative Focus Group Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Tescha NichollsCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-8229-2356
Sarah YorkCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-9944-849X
Nathan J HarrisonFlinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1011-8745
Georgia BartlettCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0009-0008-6333-4979
John Paul TroianiIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Warrawong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-9960-7353
Biljana StanoevskaIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Warrawong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-4191-7656
Mei Ling YapCollaboration for Cancer Outcomes, Research and Evaluation, Ingham Institute, UNSW Sydney, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4216-2895
Joel RheeDiscipline of General Practice, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5233-2758
Rachael H DoddThe Daffodil Centre, A Joint Venture Between The University of Sydney and Cancer Council NSW, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8080-6359
Henry M MarshallUniversity of Queensland Thoracic Research Centre and Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9626-8014
Annette McWilliamsDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3799-8527
Emily StoneCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9021-8449
Leissa PittsIllawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Warrawong, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicole M RankinCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0715-1405

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1185390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLung cancer is the number one cause of cancer death worldwide, including in Australia, where more than 15,000 cases were diagnosed in 2024. The Australian National Lung Cancer Screening Programme commenced in July 2025. Unique barriers to participation in existing cancer screening programmes exist for culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) communities. Little Australian research has engaged these communities to gauge their acceptability and readiness for the implementation of lung cancer screening (LCS). The aims were to identify barriers and enablers to LCS implementation and determine views about LCS acceptability and feasibility.

methodsCommunity-based participatory research principles were used to collaboratively engage CALD stakeholders. The research team worked with highly experienced programme managers, multicultural health workers and bilingual facilitators/translators ('leaders') who provide support and education to Arabic-speaking/Lebanese, Macedonian, Vietnamese and Italian communities. Leaders used culturally appropriate methods to recruit participants and deliver focus groups. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using a coding framework based on the Health Equity Implementation Framework.

resultsSeven focus groups were conducted either face to face (n = 5) or online (n = 2) with 57 participants across New South Wales, Australia. Six groups were delivered in community languages. LCS was generally perceived as acceptable across all focus groups. Key enablers towards engagement were understanding the importance of screening for early detection, provision of interpreters and easily accessible locations. Key barriers were financial and language barriers, poor experiences with other cancer screening programmes, concerns about tobacco-related eligibility criteria and cancer-related stigma.

conclusionsThis qualitative study provides crucial foundational evidence from four culturally diverse Australian communities about barriers and enablers to inform Programme implementation. The findings are highly relevant to other jurisdictions that may be preparing for LCS implementation or need to modify programmes to engage culturally diverse populations to screen. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Members of the public were directly involved as participants in this research. Multicultural health workers and bilingual facilitators/interpreters who work with CALD communities were involved in all phases of the study design and implementation, including recruitment, development of semi-structured focus group guide, focus group facilitation and reviewing the manuscript.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyCultural DiversityEarly Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsAgedAustraliaCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareQualitative Researchacceptabilityculturally and linguistically diverse communitiesearly detectionfocus groupsimplementationlung cancer screeningmulticultural

Identifiers

PMID41549621
PMCPMC12813417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.