Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41549591›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026

Automating the analysis of public saliency and attitudes toward biodiversity from digital media.

Noah Giebink, Amrita Gupta, Diogo Veríssimo, Charlotte H Chang, Tony Chang, Angela Brennan, Brett G Dickson, Alex Bowmer, Jonathan Baillie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Automating the analysis of public saliency and attitudes toward biodiversity from digital media.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. New opportunities and challenges for conservation evidence synthesis from advances in natural language processing.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noah GiebinkConservation Science Partners, Inc., Truckee, California, USA.
Amrita GuptaConservation Science Partners, Inc., Truckee, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2643-5865
Diogo VeríssimoOn the Edge, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-6782
Charlotte H ChangDepartment of Biology, Environmental Analysis Program, Pomona College, Claremont, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-7721
Tony ChangConservation Science Partners, Inc., Truckee, California, USA.
Angela BrennanConservation Science Partners, Inc., Truckee, California, USA.
Brett G DicksonConservation Science Partners, Inc., Truckee, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4160-839X
Alex BowmerOn the Edge, London, UK.
Jonathan BaillieOn the Edge, London, UK.

Funding

Conservation Science Partners, Inc.On the Edge
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measuring public attitudes toward wildlife provides crucial insights into human relationships with nature and helps monitor progress toward Global Biodiversity Framework targets. Yet, conducting such assessments at a global scale presents challenges. Digital news and social media offer a rich record of public discourse, but extracting information about attitudes toward wildlife from these sources is not straightforward. Selecting effective search terms is complicated by differences between everyday names for taxa and their scientific or formal common names, and raw news and social media data are often cluttered with irrelevant content and syndicated articles. To address search term selection, we used a folk taxonomy approach that derives recognizable species groupings from shared common name endings. We identified syndicated articles by using cosine similarity on term frequency-inverse document frequency vectors. To filter out irrelevant content while minimizing the need for corpus-specific annotation and model training, we developed a 2-stage relevance filter that uses unsupervised learning to reveal common topics and an open-source zero-shot large language model (LLM) to assign topics to article titles and estimate relevance. We conducted sentiment, topic, and volume analyses on the resulting data. To illustrate our method, we examined news and X posts containing search terms for bats, pangolins, elephants, and gorillas from 2019 through 2021, a period that covers the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Up to 62% of articles containing bat search terms were unrelated to bats as wildlife, underscoring the importance of relevance filtering. News articles mentioning horseshoe bats, initially implicated in the outbreak, increased significantly in January 2020, with significant sentiment shifts in news and X posts mentioning horseshoe bats emerging later (October 2020). Our methods provide a practical application of modern, general-purpose natural language processing (NLP) tools, including LLMs, for analyzing public perceptions of biodiversity relative to current events or conservation outreach and marketing campaigns.

Indexed as

AttitudeBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesPublic OpinionSocial MediaAnimalsDigital MediaHumansciencias sociales de la conservaciónclasificación de texto de disparo ceroconservation culturomicsconservation social scienceculturomía de la conservaciónenvironmental social mediafolk taxonomynatural language processingprocesamiento del lenguaje naturaltaxonomía popularzero‐shot text classification保护文化组学保护社会科学民间分类法环境社交媒体自然语言处理零样本文本分类

Identifiers

PMID41549591
PMCPMC13036311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.