Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41549371›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Anything but Endo: Diagnostic Buck-Passing in Endometriosis Diagnosis.

Rita Dexter, Megan Kitts, Heather Welty, Melanie Jeske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rita DexterDepartment of Sociology, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-1401-699X
Megan KittsSchool of Nursing and Center for Global Health Ethics, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6933-9262
Heather WeltyCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Melanie JeskeCenter for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People living with endometriosis, a disease in which tissue similar to the lining of the uterus grows elsewhere in the body, often experience prolonged diagnostic journeys because of symptom variability, normalisation of period pain and other symptoms, and lack of awareness of the condition. In this article, we analyse the endometriosis diagnostic journey through the lens of epistemic injustice. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 52 people living with endometriosis in the United States, we introduce the concept of diagnostic buck-passing to characterise the phenomenon wherein individuals who seek treatment for their symptoms end up stuck in a cycle of seeing different providers across ranging specialities, which ultimately delays their diagnosis. We describe diagnostic buck-passing and the conditions that give rise to its emergence, grounding our conceptualisation in endometriosis diagnosis. Utilising concepts of undone science and wilful ignorance, we demonstrate how endometriosis diagnosis becomes a site of hermeneutical injustice due to a long history of underinvestment in women's health research and resultant knowledge gaps in clinical care.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisEndometriosisAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41549371
PMCPMC12813254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.