ArticleSociology of health & illness2026
Forms of Capital in Navigating Health and Welfare Services for Disabled Children: Parental Resources and Institutional Demands.
Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Invisible Navigators: Migrant Parents and the Everyday Labour of Managing Sickle Cell Disease in the UK.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
- Forms of Capital in Navigating Health and Welfare Services for Disabled Children: Parental Resources and Institutional Demands.Sociology of health & illness · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This article examines how differences in forms of capital shape families' experience of navigating complex health and welfare institutions within a system formally committed to equality and universal provision. Using Bourdieu's theory of capital, this study explores how parents of disabled children in Norway mobilise various resources to access, coordinate and manage health and welfare services. Based on qualitative interviews with 21 families, the analysis shows how these forms of capital function as both enabling and constraining mechanisms. Cultural capital supports alignment with bureaucratic expectations. Social capital provides access to practical support and insider knowledge. Economic capital offers flexibility and helps fill gaps where services fall short. Crucially, the ability to activate these resources depends on families' mental and physical stamina. This article shows how the navigation of health and welfare services is shaped by the interaction between institutional structures and families' capacity to mobilise resources, producing socially patterned differences in how the process unfolds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.