Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41549290›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology2026

Gun ownership for political protection or armed political expression: a nationally representative analysis of differences in 2025 vs. 2023.

Julie A Ward, Rebecca A Valek, Vanya C Jones, Lilliana Mason, Cassandra K Crifasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie A WardDepartment of Medicine, Health, and Society, Vanderbilt College of Arts and Science, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA. Julie.ward@vanderbilt.edu.
Rebecca A ValekOregon Health & Science University, Portland State University School of Public Health, 1810 SW 5th Ave, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Vanya C JonesDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Lilliana MasonSNF Agora Institute of Political Science, Johns Hopkins University, 3100 Wyman Park Dr, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA.
Cassandra K CrifasiCenter for Gun Violence Solutions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReasons for gun ownership have shifted from primarily for hunting, to protection from other people, and increasingly for concerns about political violence. In 2023, these reasons differed by party affiliation. In the aftermath of the 2024 Presidential election, the objective of this study was to compare gun owners' reasons for gun ownership in January 2025 vs. 2023, overall and by political party affiliation.

methodsWe analyzed two waves of gun owning respondents to the National Survey of Gun Policy (n = 2,003). In both waves, fielded 1/4/23 - 2/6/23 and 1/6/25 - 1/24/25, respondents identified personally important reasons for gun ownership from 10 potential reasons (e.g., at-home protection, out-of-home protection, protection from police, ideological conflict, hunting or recreation). We calculated weighted proportions to generate nationally representative estimates and compared reasons for gun ownership in 2025 to 2023 overall and by political affiliation (i.e., Republican, Democrat, or Independent).

resultsIn 2025 (vs. 2023), more gun owners valued gun ownership "for protection at demonstrations, rallies, or protests" (42% vs. 35%) and for hunting (81% vs. 74%), but fewer valued ownership "to advance an important political objective" (22% vs. 35%). Increases were largely driven by Republican gun owners, who also rated higher at-home protection (97% vs. 93%) and protection against police violence (34% vs. 25%). Fewer Republican, Democrat, and Independent gun owners valued ownership "to advance an important political objective."

conclusionsAs political violence escalated nationally, larger portions of gun owners rejected such violence, while also seeking to protect themselves from it. Safety and policy implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Gun ownershipGun violence preventionPartisanshipPolitical violencePublic safety

Identifiers

PMID41549290
PMCPMC12895625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.