ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Biological stress, self-rated stress, anxiety and depression in women with takotsubo syndrome.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTakotsubo syndrome is a condition associated with stress, anxiety and depression. Biological stress in takotsubo syndrome is scarcely described in the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate if biological and self-rated stress, anxiety and depression in women with takotsubo syndrome reflect a long-term state of psychological burden, with the hypothesis that saliva cortisol is increased six months after the acute event. METHOD AND
resultForty-seven women were diagnosed with takotsubo syndrome in a diagnostic cross-sectional study, of those 29 had saliva cortisol measured at awakening and in the evening. Additionally, 34 women completed the perceived stress scale (PSS-14), 35 completed the hospital anxiety and depression scale-anxiety (HADS-A) scale and 33 completed hospital anxiety and depression scale-depression (HADS-D) scale, six months after the acute event. Results were compared with a population-based age-matched group of 227 women from the Swedish cardiopulmonary bioimage study (SCAPIS). Awakening saliva cortisol levels were significantly increased in takotsubo syndrome patients compared with the SCAPIS group (p = 0.039). No significant differences were seen in evening saliva cortisol levels (p = 0.267). There was a trend, towards higher self-rated stress (p = 0.087), but no significant difference, in anxiety (p = 0.133) or depression (p = 0.385) between takotsubo syndrome patients and the population-based age-matched group. There were significant correlations between awakening saliva cortisol and anxiety (negative, p = 0.036), and between evening cortisol and self-rated stress (positive, p = 0.050) but no correlation with depression was observed.
conclusionWomen with takotsubo syndrome have higher levels of cortisol in saliva measured in the morning, but similar levels measured in the evening six months after the acute event when compared with population-based controls. We found weak associations between biological (cortisol) and psychological (PPS-14, HADS-A and HADS-D) assessments. The effect size of the difference in awakening cortisol was small and the clinical relevance is uncertain, but the results indicates that takotsubo syndrome patients have signs of biological stress. Our findings, together with previous research on stress, anxiety and depression in patients with takotsubo syndrome, indicate a need for further assessment of psychological stress, possibly by interviews, and for secondary prevention to reduce stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.