ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Predictive value of a combined clinical, serum biomarker, and radiomic model for poor short-term prognosis in acute pulmonary embolism.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the predictive value of combining clinical characteristics, serum biomarkers, and radiomic features for poor prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE). Clinical data, serum biomarker data (e.g., inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers), and computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) image from patients with APE were retrospectively collected from the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Northern University, First Hospital of Zhangjiakou, and Second Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Northern University. Patients were divided into good and poor prognosis groups. Data from the first two hospitals were randomly split into a training cohort (166) and internal validation cohort (72) using a 7:3 ratio; data from the third hospital formed the external validation cohort (37). Using 3D Slicer software, thrombus regions were outlined to extract radiomic features were constructed using R software. Model performance was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, and decision curves analysis, and the Delong test. Six statistically significant radiomic features and independent clinical risk factors, including white blood cell count, neutrophile percentage, lymphocyte percentage, respiratory rate, pulse, syncope, smoking history, and RV / LV ratio, were identified (P < 0.05). The combined model outperformed individual models in the training (AUC = 0.85) (P < 0.05), internal validation (AUC = 0.86), and external validation cohorts (AUC = 0.88) (P < 0.05), demonstrating high clinical utility. The combined model effectively predicts early poor prognosis in APE, offering a robust tool for clinical evaluation and intervention planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41549198What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.