ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Development and validation of a Magnetocardiography-Based nomogram for predicting coronary stenosis in patients with normal resting electrocardiograms.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate the magnetocardiography (MCG)-integrated nomogram to improve CAD prediction in patients with normal ECGs. This prospective cohort study enrolled 421 patients undergoing coronary angiography at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. Participants with normal resting ECGs were included. Clinical data encompassed demographics, vital signs, laboratory/imaging results, comorbidities, and echocardiographic indices. Magnetocardiography (MCG) recordings were acquired via the Cardiomox MCG-9 system under electromagnetic shielding. Nomogram development integrated LASSO-regularized logistic regression to select predictors. Key MCG parameters and conventional biomarkers were incorporated into the nomogram’s graphical scoring system. Model performance was evaluated through AUC, calibration, and clinical utility (decision curve analysis). Analyses used R v4.2.2 and MSTATA v3.1, with p < 0.05 for significance. The nomogram achieved moderate efficacy, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.777 (95% CI: 0.723–0.831) in the training cohort and 0.643 (95% CI: 0.543–0.743) in validation. MCG-derived parameters, including TT_mean_F_30 (OR = 1.01, p = 0.035), identified subclinical repolarization abnormalities undetectable by ECG. Calibration analysis showed moderate accuracy (Brier score = 19.1). External validation revealed the nomogram’s clinical applicability for guiding therapeutic decisions in patients with normal ECGs. This study pioneers the integration of MCG into clinical CAD screening, addressing ECG’s sensitivity limitations. The MCG nomogram offers a scalable tool for early ischemia diagnosis, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41549190What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.