ArticleAnimal cognition2026
Same-different learning of odour stimuli in dogs.
Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance of detection dogs relies on their ability to detect and alert to variations of the stimuli upon which they have been trained. As such, research has tended to focus on understanding the likelihood of generalising beyond a trained stimulus set. However, it remains unclear which stimuli dogs perceive as the ‘same’ or ‘different’ to others. Understanding this perception would allow the creation of appropriate training aids to improve the performance of working dogs. The aim of this study was to establish whether dogs were capable of same-different concept learning with odours and whether they could generalise this learning to a novel stimulus set. Dogs were presented with two odours simultaneously and trained to give one indication behaviour if the samples were the same, and an alternative indication if they were different. Four of the ten dogs tested were able to meet the learning criteria, indicating that they could learn the task with the training stimuli. However, none were able to generalise the concept to a new stimulus set. The failure of the dogs to generalise the same-different learning to novel stimuli suggests that the procedure used, while showing some promise, may not be the best approach to assess how dogs perceive odours in relation to each other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.