Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41549147›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2026

Same-different learning of odour stimuli in dogs.

Claire Ricci-Bonot, Amelia Duncan, Daniel S Mills, Thomas W Pike, Helen Zulch, Victoria F Ratcliffe, Michael Nickson, Emma Hobbs, Anna Wilkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claire Ricci-BonotAnimal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, Dept. of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7DL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6484-1904
Amelia DuncanAnimal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, Dept. of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7DL, UK.
Daniel S MillsAnimal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, Dept. of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7DL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4765-9625
Thomas W PikeAnimal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, Dept. of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7DL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-0498
Helen ZulchAnimal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, Dept. of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7DL, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8933-6421
Victoria F RatcliffeDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Michael NicksonDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Emma HobbsDefence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Anna WilkinsonAnimal Behaviour, Cognition and Welfare Group, Dept. of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, LN6 7DL, UK. awilkinson@lincoln.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4500-0181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of detection dogs relies on their ability to detect and alert to variations of the stimuli upon which they have been trained. As such, research has tended to focus on understanding the likelihood of generalising beyond a trained stimulus set. However, it remains unclear which stimuli dogs perceive as the ‘same’ or ‘different’ to others. Understanding this perception would allow the creation of appropriate training aids to improve the performance of working dogs. The aim of this study was to establish whether dogs were capable of same-different concept learning with odours and whether they could generalise this learning to a novel stimulus set. Dogs were presented with two odours simultaneously and trained to give one indication behaviour if the samples were the same, and an alternative indication if they were different. Four of the ten dogs tested were able to meet the learning criteria, indicating that they could learn the task with the training stimuli. However, none were able to generalise the concept to a new stimulus set. The failure of the dogs to generalise the same-different learning to novel stimuli suggests that the procedure used, while showing some promise, may not be the best approach to assess how dogs perceive odours in relation to each other.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLearningOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleSmellCanineCognitionConcept learningOdour detectionOdour spaceSame-different

Identifiers

PMID41549147
PMCPMC12819428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.