ArticleNeurosurgical review2026
Microvascular decompression for vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia-related primary trigeminal neuralgia: surgical approaches, technical considerations, and clinical outcomes.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the surgical strategies, technical aspects, and clinical outcomes of microvascular decompression (MVD) in treating primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN) associated with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 34 consecutive VBD-related PTN patients treated by a single neurosurgeon at China-Japan Friendship Hospital from January 2020 to April 2025. VBD compression patterns were classified into two types: Type I: Imaging showing significant brainstem deformation and obliteration of the arachnoid space by VBD (n = 16, 47.1%). Type II: Imaging confirming VBD with minimal or no brainstem deformation and preserved arachnoid space (n = 18, 52.9%). Type-specific MVD techniques were applied: a four-step approach for Type I and a three-step approach for Type II. Outcomes were assessed using the Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Scale (BNI) during follow-up (range: 2-64 months). Results Among 1,214 PTN patients treated during the study period, 34 (2.8%) had VBD-related PTN. Preoperative BNI grades: Grade V in 8 patients (23.5%), Grade IV in 26 patients (76.5%). Comorbid cranial neuropathies were present in 17.6% (6/34) of patients. Postoperative outcomes: BNI Grade I in 91.2% (31/34), BNI Grade II in 8.9% (3/34). The overall success rate (BNI ≤ II) was 100%. Conclusion VBD-related PTN is a rare condition characterized by severe refractory pain. Tailored MVD strategies, based on VBD compression morphology (Type I vs. Type II), provide a safe and effective surgical approach, resulting in excellent pain relief.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.