ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning integrating MRI and clinical features predicts early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine learning models for predicting liver cancer: a real-world cohort study in China.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to construct a robust artificial intelligence (AI) model to predict early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following surgical resection, leveraging clinical blood biomarkers, pathological parameters, and MRI-derived features. We included 240 hepatectomy patients from two medical centers, collecting clinical blood biomarkers, MRI features, and postoperative pathological data. Feature reduction was conducted using Spearman correlation and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Predictive models were constructed using five machine learning algorithms and validated on an external dataset. The models were subsequently compared. The ExtraTrees, XGBoost, and LightGBM models exhibited high predictive performance in the training set, with AUCs of 0.816 (95% CI 0.748-0.884), 0.978 (95% CI 0.958-0.998), and 0.898 (95% CI 0.846-0.950), respectively. In the validation set, their AUC values were 0.759 (95% CI 0.641-0.876), 0.789 (95% CI 0.684-0.894), and 0.760 (95% CI 0.650-0.869). Decision curve analysis indicated favorable net benefits for predicting early recurrence across all three models. Tumor margin and age were identified as significant factors, showing strong associations with early recurrence. This study developed AI model utilizing clinical blood biomarkers, MRI features, and pathological information to predict early recurrence of HCC after surgery. The models demonstrated good predictive performance and showed clinical applicability in predicting early recurrence, potentially assisting clinicians in identifying high-risk patients, guiding individualized surveillance, and optimizing postoperative management. However, inherent biases in this retrospective study necessitate further research for validation and refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.