ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhanced YOLOv11n for small object detection in UAV imagery: higher accuracy with fewer parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- RIF-YOLO-N: Lightweight P3 Residual Identity Fusion with Resolution-Guided Fine-Tuning for Tiny-Object Detection.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- SFC-YOLO: An Accuracy-Enhanced and Parameter-Efficient YOLO Framework for Small Vehicle Detection in Aerial Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Object detection in UAV imagery faces several challenges due to high-altitude aerial capture: targets are densely distributed, small objects account for a large proportion, and onboard computing power is limited, leading to low detection accuracy and high rates of false and missed detections. To address these issues, this paper proposes an improved YOLOv11 model. First, we design a Multiscale Edge-Feature Adaptive Selection (MSEAF) module in the backbone to effectively cope with the predominance of small objects and weak edge information. Second, we use the ScalCat and Scal3DC modules to reconstruct the neck and add a P2 small-object detection head, alleviating feature degradation in multiscale processing and improving the utilization of high-resolution information. Finally, we design a shared, reparameterized lightweight detection head (SRepD) to resolve the computational redundancy and insufficient feature fusion of conventional heads. On the VisDrone2019 dataset, compared with the YOLOv11n baseline, our model increases mAP50 and Precision by 4.6% while reducing the number of parameters by approximately 8.5%. On the TinyPerson dataset, which contains only two extremely small categories, our model improves mAP50 and Precision by 5.5% and 5.6%, respectively, with a 7.7% reduction in parameters relative to YOLOv11n. Compared with the larger YOLOv11s, our model achieves gains of 3.8% in mAP50 and 3.2% in Precision while using only 25% of its parameters, demonstrating cross-scale performance superiority. On the HazyDet dataset, the first UAV-perspective hazy scene dataset, our model also demonstrates superior detection performance compared to the YOLOv11n baseline.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.