ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026
Degradation Determinants Are Abundant in Human Noncanonical Proteins and Minor Annotated Isoforms.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Emergence Biases in Molecular Evolution.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Review
- Ribo-ITP enables identification of translons from limited input samples.Nature communications · 2026Article
- No Time to Fold: Intrinsically Disordered Microproteins in Action.Biochemistry · 2026Review
- De Novo Genes: Current Status and Future Goals.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- YeastbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- High-quality peptide evidence for annotating non-canonical open reading frames as human proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The comprehensive characterization of human proteins, a key objective in contemporary biology, has been revolutionized by the identification of thousands of potential novel proteins through ribosome profiling and proteomics. Determining the physiological activity of these noncanonical proteins has proven difficult, because they are encoded by different types of coding regions and tend to share no sequence similarity with canonical polypeptides. Evidence from immunopeptidomic assays combined with a better understanding of the quality control of protein synthesis suggest that many noncanonical proteins may possess low stability in the cellular environment. Here, we tested this hypothesis by analyzing the frequency of multiple sequence features eliciting either proteasomal degradation or autophagy across 91,003 canonical (annotated) protein isoforms and 11,499 noncanonical proteins. Overall, noncanonical proteins were enriched for degradation-related features compared to all canonical proteins. Notably, degradation determinants were also enriched in canonical protein isoforms starting with a non-methionine amino acid. Analyses of original and shuffled sequences showed evidence of selective pressure either against or toward the accumulation of specific degradation signatures only in major isoforms of canonical proteins. However, stability was significantly higher in noncanonical proteins with evidence of phenotypic effects upon knock-out in cell lines. Notably, we found that the C-terminal tail hydrophobicity represents a reliable proxy for degradation propensity with potential applications in identifying functional noncanonical proteins. These findings underscore the critical role of degradation processes in regulating the half-life of noncanonical proteins and demonstrate the power of degradation-associated signatures in discriminating noncanonical genes likely to encode biologically functional molecules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.