ArticleHippocampus2026
Updated Neuronal Numbers of the Rat Hippocampal Formation: Redesigning the Hippocampal Model.
Article in Hippocampus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The hippocampal formation is a functional entity that includes the hippocampus, subicular complex, and the entorhinal cortex, and has an essential role in learning and memory, emotional processing, and spatial coding. The well-defined structure of hippocampal fields and the segregation of the connections have made this structure a favorite candidate for functional models that rely on fundamental information such as the number of neurons populating the hippocampal fields. Existing models on the rat rely on neuronal populations obtained from single studies, so we aimed to obtain more representative estimates by analyzing all available data. We identified 89 studies using reliable methodology that provided 264 stereological estimates of principal neuron populations. The resulting averages for males showed 1,000,000 neurons for the granule cell layer (GCL); 50,000 for the hilus; 210,000 for CA3; ~30,000 for CA2; 350,000 for CA1; and 300,000 for the Subiculum. Entorhinal cortex (EC) averages for both sexes showed 108,000 neurons in layer II; 270,000 in layer III; and 340,000 in layer V/VI. Most of those estimates are significantly different from those traditionally used in hippocampal models (e.g., ~2-fold difference in EC layer II), revealing an updated architecture of the rat hippocampal formation that might help build more realistic models of hippocampal connectivity and function. Comparisons by age or sex were not reliable given the scarce data available from adolescents or females, while comparisons by strain showed inconsistent results, with similar populations in most fields but significant differences in CA3/CA2. The reliability of this finding is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.