Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41548881›Full record

ArticleThe Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry2026

Uptake, utilisation and costs of treatment through Better Access from 2018 to 2022: An analysis of Medicare Benefits Schedule data.

Caley Tapp, Roman Scheurer, Philip Burgess, Long Khanh-Dao Le, Cathrine Mihalopoulos, Dianne Currier, Jane Pirkis, Meredith Harris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Australia's Better Access initiative: An overview.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  7. Australia's Better Access initiative: A survey of provider and referrer views.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  8. A virtual consultative forum on future reforms to Better Access.The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caley TappSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2731-7345
Roman ScheurerSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2482-7953
Philip BurgessSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-0363
Long Khanh-Dao LeHealth Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9442-6824
Cathrine MihalopoulosHealth Economics Group, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7127-9462
Dianne CurrierCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-271X
Jane PirkisCentre for Mental Health and Community Wellbeing, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2538-4472
Meredith HarrisSchool of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0096-729X

Funding

Australian Government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAustralia's Better Access initiative enables Australians with mental disorders to receive sessions of evidence-based psychological treatment following referral from an eligible provider (usually a general practitioner), subsidised through Medicare. As part of a commissioned evaluation, we examined patterns of Better Access treatment.

methodsWe sourced aggregated Medicare Benefits Schedule data from Services Australia on Better Access services delivered from 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2022. From this, we developed profiles of Better Access treatment over time and according to key consumer characteristics.

resultsIn 2021, over 1.3 million Australians received at least one treatment session subsidised through Better Access (up by 0.9% per year since 2018). People living in medium/high socioeconomic status areas within major cities, females and young adults were more likely to receive Better Access treatment compared to other groups. Consumers made an out-of-pocket payment for two-thirds (64.8%) of treatment sessions in 2021 (vs 52.7% in 2018). The median out-of-pocket payment per session was constant between 2018 and 2021 ($74) but increased to $90 in the first half of 2022. In 2021, 29.9% of fees charged for all treatment sessions nationally came from consumer out-of-pocket payments (vs 24.5% in 2018). Fewer people accessed treatment following referral in 2021 than in 2018 (58.8% vs 66.9%), and those who did waited longer until their first session (median 22 days in 2021 vs 18 days in 2018).

conclusionBetter Access enables many Australians to receive psychological treatment. Efforts are required to address gaps in access and increased wait time and consumer costs.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsHealth Services AccessibilityMental Health ServicesNational Health ProgramsPsychotherapyAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMental Disordersallied health professionalsBetter Accessbulk-billinghealth care costsmental health servicesout-of-pocket paymentsprimary carepsychological therapysocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID41548881
PMCPMC12932684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.