ArticleBio Systems2026
Information transmission and processing in G-protein-coupled-receptor complexes.
Article in Bio Systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present a general theoretical framework for molecular computation in biological systems and apply it to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which serve as central regulators of cellular information processing. Despite their importance, the physical principles underlying GPCR switching remain incompletely understood. Using nonequilibrium thermodynamics, we construct a model that identifies the parameters governing receptor-state transitions. The framework shows that the configuration of the switch is governed by two factors: the ATP/GTP-driven chemical flux through the receptor complex and the free-energy difference between competing switch states. The model predicts that GPCRs can occupy three quasistable configurations, corresponding to "on", "off", and an intermediate state, each representing a local maximum in information transmission. Switch states can also be characterized by whether the switch supports a net chemical flux. Active states support sustained chemical flux, whereas inactive states do not. The model incorporates reciprocal conformation-fit changes between ligand and receptor. As such, the model predicts that phosphatase activity, represented as an effective energy barrier, primarily determines whether the switch occupies the "on" or "off" state, whereas kinase activity maintains flux without directly setting state occupancy. These predictions based on experimental evidence point to new targets for drug design. Comparison with label-free impedance measurements supports the existence of multiple quasistable states that depend on ligand conformation. Because the framework relies on general nonequilibrium principles rather than system-specific biochemistry, it extends naturally to other biological switching systems driven by chemical flux.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.