ReviewJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2026
Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in diagnosis and management of muscular dystrophies.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac MRI in cardiac dystrophinopathy: recommendations on imaging.Open heart · 2026Review
- Cardiac Involvement in Emery-Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy, from Arrhythmias to Heart Failure and Sudden Death: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Nomogram Integrating Clinical and Cardiac Imaging for Predicting Short-Term Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Decline in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Muscular dystrophies encompass a heterogeneous spectrum of inherited myopathies characterized by progressive skeletal muscle degeneration frequently accompanied by life-threatening cardiac involvement. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has become the reference non-invasive imaging modality for the detection, characterization, and longitudinal monitoring of cardiomyopathy involvement across this group of disorders. This state-of-the-art review summarized contemporary evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic value of CMR in the most prevalent muscular dystrophies, including Myotonic dystrophy, Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies, Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, laminopathies, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, and mitochondrial myopathies. CMR uniquely enables high-resolution assessment of ventricular volumes and function, tissue characterization through late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and parametric mapping (native T1, T2, extracellular volume fraction), and quantitative strain imaging. These techniques uncover subclinical myocardial involvement years before overt dysfunction occurs, providing a robust substrate for early therapeutic intervention. Disease-specific CMR signatures, such as inferolateral subepicardial fibrosis in dystrophinopathies or mid-wall septal enhancement in laminopathies, allow for refined etiological diagnosis and targeted risk stratification. LGE burden and distribution are independently associated with ventricular arrhythmias and adverse cardiac events, transcending the limitations of traditional criteria based on left ventricular ejection fraction for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection. Emerging evidence further supports the integration of CMR biomarkers into genotype-guided management strategies and prospective therapeutic trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.