ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2026
Impact of the interruption of tamoxifen for pregnancy on the recurrence and survival outcomes among young women with breast cancer.
Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYoung survivors of breast cancer often consider pregnancy after completing or interrupting endocrine therapy. However, concerns remain regarding the safety of tamoxifen interruption for pregnancy and its impact on survival outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of interrupting and resuming tamoxifen for pregnancy on recurrence and mortality in patients with breast cancer, using real-world data.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service National Health Information Database. Among 32,378 women aged 18-45 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2014, patients were categorized into groups based on tamoxifen interruption and pregnancy: Group 1 (interruption and resumption, n = 126), Group 2 (interruption without resumption, n = 261), Group 3 (initiation of tamoxifen after childbirth, n = 41), and Control (no interruption nor pregnancy, n =428). The control group was age-matched to the interruption groups in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical outcomes, including recurrence and mortality, were compared among groups.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 8.5 years, Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly lower risks of recurrence than the control group did (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.76, P = 0.005; HR 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.18-0.50, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Group 2 also showed better survival outcomes (HR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08-0.41, P < 0.001). Pregnancy outcomes differed across groups: Groups 1 and 2 had higher rates of full-term pregnancies, whereas Group 3 had a significantly higher abortion rate (23.8 %, 23.4 % vs. 56.1 %, respectively).
conclusionThese findings suggest that temporary tamoxifen interruption for pregnancy may be a viable option for young survivors of breast cancer. Further studies are warranted to clarify the long-term impact of tamoxifen interruption on prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.