Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41548210›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026

Comparative Fluctuating Asymmetry and Directional Asymmetry in Four Cattle Skulls.

Nicoleta Manuta, Vezir Januzi, Ermiş Ozkan, Burak Ünal, Buket Çakar, Fatma İşbilir, Oleg P Melnyk, Barış Can Güzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Beginner's Guide for Using Bone in Marine Mammal Research.Integrative and comparative biology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pelvic Girdle Fluctuating Asymmetry in the Domestic Cat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicoleta ManutaInstitute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Vezir JanuziAgriculture and Environmental Engineering, University for Business and Technology, Pristina, Kosovo.
Ermiş OzkanDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5000-5075
Burak ÜnalDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Buket ÇakarInstitute of Graduate Studies, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Fatma İşbilirDepartment of Anatomy, Siirt University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Siirt, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6110-1302
Oleg P MelnykNational University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Barış Can GüzelDepartment of Anatomy, Siirt University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Siirt, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2504-120X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates fluctuating asymmetry (FA) and directional asymmetry (DA) in the skulls of four cattle breeds: Eastern Anatolian Red, Southern Anatolian Red, Holstein and Simmental by using geometric morphometrics methods. A total of 89 skulls were analysed (Eastern Anatolian Red, n = 16; Southern Anatolian Red, n = 21; Simmental, n = 24; Holstein, n = 28) using 3D landmark based methods, including Procrustes superimposition, principal component analysis (PCA) and Procrustes ANOVA. PCA showed that the first two axes explained 32.39% of DA variation and 26.2% of FA variation, reflecting the multidimensional nature of cranial asymmetry. The results show that DA accounts for a greater proportion of total shape variation than FA, indicating a consistent asymmetry pattern across breeds. PCA revealed overlapping FA among breeds, with Holstein and Eastern Anatolian Red exhibiting greater variation, indicating higher developmental instability. FA, a marker of developmental instability, was most prominent along the horizontal (x-axis) and vertical (y-axis) planes, particularly in the nasal and orbital regions, suggesting mechanical loading as a possible influence. Procrustes ANOVA confirmed significant breed effects for skull shape (p < 0.0001), but asymmetry was not breed dependent. The analysis revealed that DA is primarily influenced by biomechanical factors, such as head posture, muscle attachments and habitual head movements, particularly in the occipital region. In contrast to masticatory structures, nasal asymmetry was linked to respiratory efficiency and environmental adaptation. These findings provide new insights into the role of genetic and environmental influences on cattle skull development and demonstrate the value of geometric morphometrics methods in capturing subtle morphological variation beyond traditional linear measurements.

Indexed as

SkullAnimalsCattleFemaleMalePrincipal Component Analysisbilateral symmetryBos taurusbreed comparisoncranial morphologydevelopmental instabilityprocrustes analysis

Identifiers

PMID41548210
PMCPMC12812312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.