ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Modular organization of intermuscular and interjoint interaction during ball catching.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine the organization of ball-catching movements with different biomechanical structures, which are among the profile elements in rhythmic gymnastics, based on common synergies. An additional goal was to identify specific synergies presumably formed during the performing of movements with increased coordinative complexity. Synergy parameters were derived from simultaneously recorded electromyographic (EMG) data from 16 muscles and joint angle kinematics; factor analysis and principal component analysis were applied. It was found that at the kinematic level, participants demonstrated similar motor control strategies for catching the ball. Interjoint coordination was structured into two modules, independent of the motor task's complexity. The specificity of kinematic modules manifested in a shift of the main peak of interjoint interaction synchronization, driven by the subjective perception of the ball contact moment. At the muscular level, up to five muscle modules were identified, two of which were consistently present across different ball-catching movements. Their function is associated with generating active motions of the upper limb segments and stabilizing the shoulder girdle. The component composition of muscle synergies is largely determined by the movements' biomechanical structure and the presence of a common subtask within them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41548160What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.