Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41548128›Full record

ArticleMacromolecular bioscience2026

In Vivo Evaluation of Injected and Bioprinted Hyaluronic Acid-Based Bioink in Corneal Stromal Pocket.

Abhinav Reddy Kethiri, Paula Puistola, Maija Huuskonen, Suvi Huhtanen, Karoliina Hopia, Susanna Miettinen, Anni Mörö, Heli Skottman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Macromolecular bioscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abhinav Reddy KethiriEye Regeneration Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Paula PuistolaEye Regeneration Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Maija HuuskonenEye Regeneration Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Suvi HuhtanenEye Regeneration Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Karoliina HopiaEye Regeneration Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Susanna MiettinenAdult Stem Cell Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Anni MöröEye Regeneration Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Heli SkottmanEye Regeneration Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4127-8792

Funding

Jane ja Aatos Erkon Säätiö 200063Research Council of Finland 312413Research Council of Finland 324082Research Council of Finland 326588Research Council of Finland 336666Research Council of Finland 337607Research Council of Finland 365398Research-to-Business funding by Business Finland 6763/31/2021Silmä- ja kudospankkisäätiö 20230015Suomen Kulttuurirahasto 00230595Suomen Kulttuurirahasto 00232448Suomen Kulttuurirahasto 00242643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The corneal stroma contains specialized stromal keratocytes (CSKs) that preserve corneal transparency and homogeneity. Stromal scarring and opacities lead to vision loss in millions globally. While corneal transplantation remains the gold standard, it is constrained by donor shortages. Cell-based therapies using primary stromal cells show promise but still depend on donor tissue. Human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (hASCs) offer an abundant alternative, capable of differentiating into CSKs. A three-dimensional (3D) tissue matrix is essential for mimicking native tissue and supporting stromal regeneration. Hyaluronic acid (HA)-based matrices emerge as promising stromal substitutes. In this study, we aim to investigate the biocompatibility of HA-based bioink, both as injectable formulations and bioprinted constructs containing hASC-CSKs. In vitro, bioprinted HA-based constructs containing hASC-CSKs exhibit high cell viability, an organized structure, and maintained transparency. In vivo, the bioink integrates progressively into the corneal stroma, considerably reducing stromal thickness within two weeks. It supports the hASC-CSK phenotype post-transplantation, as indicated by lumican expression. Although inflammatory responses are observed, the bioink shields transplanted cells from immune rejection, promoting graft survival and integration. These findings demonstrate that HA-based bioink serves as a biocompatible scaffold for cell delivery, supporting stromal regeneration and highlighting its potential for future corneal therapies.

Indexed as

BioprintingCorneal StromaHyaluronic AcidInkAdipose TissueAnimalsCell SurvivalCorneal TransplantationHumansLumicanStem CellsStromal CellsTissue ScaffoldsHyaluronic AcidLumicanLUM protein, humancorneal keratocytescorneal stromal pockethuman adipose‐derived stem cellshyaluronic acid bioinkmulti‐material 3D bioprinting

Identifiers

PMID41548128
PMCPMC12812298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.