ArticleEuropean journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe2026
Opinions, Attitudes and Beliefs Regarding Spirituality and Religiosity in the Clinical Practice of Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the opinions, attitudes and beliefs of dental students regarding the role of spirituality and religiosity (S/R) in clinical practice.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in a Brazilian dental school. The Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Network for Research Spirituality and Health (NERSH) questionnaire was used. Descriptive analyses were conducted to report data and logistic regression models were constructed to identify the factors associated with students' opinions, attitudes and beliefs about S/R.
resultsA total of 336 undergraduate dental students (response rate = 83.1%) were included, predominantly females (66.4%) and mean age of 22.2 (SD: 3.6) years. Most students identified as moderately/very spiritual (69.6%) and religious (64.9%), considered it appropriate to address S/R when a patient/relative brings them up (69%), and agreed that beliefs could greatly influence a patient's health (61%). This influence was also noted for dental conditions such as temporomandibular joint dysfunction (68.5%), periodontal disease (63.4%) and dental caries (50.4%). However, most (78.0%) had never addressed S/R during consultations and did not receive formal training (84.8%). Seven out of ten students reported barriers that discourage them from discussing S/R, including fear of offending patients, professional neutrality and subject discomfort. Generally, older students, male students, those at more advanced stages of the programme, and those with stronger S/R beliefs tended to have more positive opinions and attitudes toward the subject.
conclusionAlthough most dental students hold positive opinions and attitudes toward S/R in clinical practice, structured training and systematic approaches remain lacking. These findings underscore the importance of non-biological factors in dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.