Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41548047›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026

Precision, Accuracy, and Observer Reliability of Computed Tomography-Based Radiostereometric Analysis in Measuring Femoral Stem Migration In Vitro.

Vasileios Angelomenos, Maziar Mohaddes, Bita Shareghi, Henrik Malchau, Johan Nils Kärrholm, Raed Itayem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Precision, Accuracy, and Observer Reliability of Computed Tomography-Based Radiostereometric Analysis in Measuring Femoral Stem Migration In Vitro.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vasileios AngelomenosDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-221X
Maziar MohaddesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bita ShareghiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Henrik MalchauDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan Nils KärrholmDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Raed ItayemDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

Guldbyxans Stiftelse; Sahlgrenska University Hospitals Research Foundations
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CT-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) is a method of measuring implant micromotion using low-dose CT scans. We evaluated the precision, accuracy, and observer reliability of CT-RSA for measuring femoral stem translation in THA in vitro. A cementless femoral stem was implanted in a synthetic femur mounted on a calibrated micrometer platform. Controlled translations were applied along each orthogonal axis across 5 series, generating 90 CT data sets. Only translational micromotions were imposed and analyzed. Precision was calculated from double examinations-repeated scans of the same displacement acquired in a different series-yielding 60 pairs. The femoral stem, head, and bone were segmented, the head's geometric center was defined, and translations were analyzed. Because the platform was fixed 90° to the femoral neck (CCD 135°), data were reported both on native axes, and after a 45° counterclockwise rotation to the conventional RSA frame. Precision was estimated from double examinations (SD × t), accuracy from RMSE versus micrometer readings (RMSE × t), and reliability from intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) by two blinded observers. On native axes, precision ranged 0.06-0.08 mm and accuracy 0.09-0.13 mm. On transformed axes, precision ranged 0.06-0.07 mm and accuracy 0.03-0.14 mm. Intraobserver reliability was excellent (mean ICC 0.99 for all axes), as well as interobserver reliability (mean ICC 0.91-0.98). CT-RSA achieved sub-tenth-millimeter precision with high repeatability and excellent observer agreement. These findings support CT-RSA as a viable alternative for early migration measurement in THA research. Clinical validation with low-dose protocols and predefined quality criteria remains warranted.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemurHip ProsthesisRadiostereometric AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of Resultsaccuracycomputed tomographyCTCT‐RSAmigrationprecisionradiostereometric analysisreliabilitytotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID41548047
PMCPMC12812209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.