ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2026
Precision, Accuracy, and Observer Reliability of Computed Tomography-Based Radiostereometric Analysis in Measuring Femoral Stem Migration In Vitro.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precision, Accuracy, and Observer Reliability of Computed Tomography-Based Radiostereometric Analysis in Measuring Femoral Stem Migration In Vitro.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CT-based radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) is a method of measuring implant micromotion using low-dose CT scans. We evaluated the precision, accuracy, and observer reliability of CT-RSA for measuring femoral stem translation in THA in vitro. A cementless femoral stem was implanted in a synthetic femur mounted on a calibrated micrometer platform. Controlled translations were applied along each orthogonal axis across 5 series, generating 90 CT data sets. Only translational micromotions were imposed and analyzed. Precision was calculated from double examinations-repeated scans of the same displacement acquired in a different series-yielding 60 pairs. The femoral stem, head, and bone were segmented, the head's geometric center was defined, and translations were analyzed. Because the platform was fixed 90° to the femoral neck (CCD 135°), data were reported both on native axes, and after a 45° counterclockwise rotation to the conventional RSA frame. Precision was estimated from double examinations (SD × t), accuracy from RMSE versus micrometer readings (RMSE × t), and reliability from intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) by two blinded observers. On native axes, precision ranged 0.06-0.08 mm and accuracy 0.09-0.13 mm. On transformed axes, precision ranged 0.06-0.07 mm and accuracy 0.03-0.14 mm. Intraobserver reliability was excellent (mean ICC 0.99 for all axes), as well as interobserver reliability (mean ICC 0.91-0.98). CT-RSA achieved sub-tenth-millimeter precision with high repeatability and excellent observer agreement. These findings support CT-RSA as a viable alternative for early migration measurement in THA research. Clinical validation with low-dose protocols and predefined quality criteria remains warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.