ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2026
Comparison of Active Knee Flexion Angles With and Without Tibiofemoral Joint Rotation Control Between Individuals With and Without Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patellofemoral pain (PFP) syndrome is a common cause of anterior knee pain. Excessive tibial external rotation during knee flexion increases patellofemoral stress, and uncontrolled tibiofemoral rotation is associated with PFP syndrome. Assessing knee flexion with and without tibiofemoral joint rotation control (TFRC) may help clinicians detect impaired rotational control and guide interventions. However, few studies have compared knee flexion angles under both conditions between individuals with and without PFP syndrome. This study compared active knee flexion angles with and without TFRC and evaluated tibial external rotation using the distance between the examination table and the lateral malleolus (DBTL). MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 24 male participants (12 with PFP and 12 without PFP) underwent knee flexion angle assessments under both TFRC and non-TFRC conditions. To minimize hip movement, the examiner manually stabilized the femoral epicondyle of the test leg to keep the patella facing forward. DBTL was measured during knee flexion without TFRC to assess tibial external rotation. Data were analyzed using a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for knee flexion angles and independent t-tests for DBTL comparisons. RESULTS No significant differences in knee flexion angles were observed without TFRC. However, with TFRC, the PFP group exhibited significantly reduced knee flexion angles (P<0.01). The PFP group also showed significantly higher DBTL (P<0.01), indicating greater tibial external rotation. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that uncontrolled tibiofemoral joint rotation may represent a characteristic movement pattern in individuals with PFP and underscore the importance of considering TFRC in clinical assessments in PFP syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.