ArticleScientific reports2026
Modelling selective heating in microwave-heated packed-bed reactors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The design of efficient microwave-assisted reactors for industrially relevant processes, such as plastic waste thermochemical recycling via pyrolysis, presents substantial challenges due to the tight coupling of electromagnetic, thermal, and fluid flow phenomena within heterogeneous and anisotropic media. This study introduces a robust and reproducible methodological framework for reactor-scale simulation of microwave-heated packed beds, tailored to systems employing silicon carbide (SiC) susceptors. Realistic packed-bed geometries are first generated via Discrete Element Method (DEM) simulations, capturing the spatial arrangement of susceptor particles. To enable electromagnetic modeling, a custom de-interpenetration algorithm processes the DEM output, eliminating overlaps while preserving physical tangency. Rather than simulating the full discrete geometry — which incurs prohibitive computational costs — the final reactor model adopts a temperature-dependent effective medium representation. The medium’s complex permittivity is calibrated through a Python–COMSOL optimization loop, which matches the electromagnetic energy absorption and storage of the homogenized domain to that of DEM-based unit cells across a wide temperature range. These properties are then integrated into a coupled multiphysics model that resolves electromagnetic wave propagation, nitrogen flow through free and porous media, and dual-temperature heat transfer in a SiC–nitrogen packed bed, with microwave losses selectively applied to the susceptor phase and no explicit plastic phase or chemical reactions modelled. A proof-of-concept application demonstrates the ability of the framework to predict operational regimes that achieve pyrolysis-relevant temperatures without thermal runaway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.