ArticleScientific reports2026
Uncertainty aware hybrid learning framework for fast and safe charging of lithium-ion batteries using multi-fidelity observers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and real-time estimation of the state of charge (SoC) is critical for ensuring the performance, safety, and longevity of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles (EVs). This research work presents an Uncertainty-Aware Hybrid Learning Framework for accurate and safe State-of-Charge (SoC) prediction in lithium-ion batteries, particularly under dynamic and thermal-varying conditions during fast charging. The framework integrates multi-fidelity electrochemical observer outputs with a Tuned Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) Regressor, enabling real-time estimation of high-fidelity SoC while quantifying uncertainty using a Negative Log-Likelihood (NLL) loss. Case studies were conducted on a modified dataset simulating sensor faults and thermal distortions. The proposed model achieved a peak R² of 0.9921 and MSE of 0.000021 under clean conditions. Under thermal noise, the retrained MLP maintained strong generalization with R² as 0.9657, MSE as 0.00053, and Prediction Interval Coverage Probability (PICP) of 0.975 with a narrow MPIW of 0.200. Comparative evaluation against Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Linear Regression confirms the MLP's superior adaptability and robustness. This hybrid framework is particularly suitable for deployment in real-time Battery Management Systems (BMS) and offers a foundation for future thermal-aware predictive control in electric vehicles. The proposed framework also highlights the potential of integrating low-complexity observer models with learning algorithms for real-time applications in EV systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.