Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41547961›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2026

Modeling information demand in the framework of probabilistic reasoning.

Matthew W Jiwa, Jacqueline Gottlieb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matthew W JiwaMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. matt.jiwa@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4785-6389
Jacqueline GottliebMortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. jg2141@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-4375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciding whether, when, and which information to sample is critical for making effective decisions, yet the cognitive mechanisms of this process are not well understood. Here, we propose that key aspects of human information demand are explained by non-linear subjective perceptions of probabilistic losses or gains. Using behavioral testing and quantitative model comparisons across three independent participant samples (N = 50, 50, and 150), we show that a model that incorporates non-linear probability and value perception outperforms a model based on a linear mixture of motives in explaining instrumental and non-instrumental information demand. Moreover, individual non-linearities that best explained information demand were correlated with personality traits and with non-linearities explaining risk seeking/aversion in standard choice tasks. The results suggest that a computational framework rooted in the subjective perception of probability furthers our understanding of information demand and its relationship with decision making under risk and uncertainty.

Identifiers

PMID41547961
PMCPMC12913900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.