ArticleScientific reports2026
Upright and supine assessment of pelvic floor muscle defects in women with and without prolapse.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The levator ani muscle (LAM), crucial for pelvic organ support, can develop defects that contribute to pelvic floor disorders (PFD) like pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Factors such as childbirth, aging, and menopause increase the risk of LAM damage. While MRI is commonly used to assess LAM, most studies use the supine position, potentially underestimating POP severity. Upright MRI offers a more accurate view of pelvic floor support under natural conditions. The aim of this study was to compare the pelvic floor support across four groups of women-nulliparous, parous premenopausal, parous postmenopausal, and women with POP, by analysing pubococcygeus muscle (PCM) and iliococcygeus muscle (ICM) defects and the iliococcygeus angle (ICA) using a tiltable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. Sixty-three women were included and divided into 4 groups: 15 nulliparous (Nulli), 15 parous-premenopausal (Par-pre), 15 parous-postmenopausal (Par-post) and 18 patients with minimum stage 2 prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall or uterus (POP). Women underwent supine and upright MRI scans. PCM and ICM defects were assessed on both the supine and upright scans. Defects were categorized as "none", "minor" or "major" following previously established guidelines. Using upright MRI scans and manual segmentation of the LAM, the ICA was determined in 5planes from anterior to posterior. Statistical testing was performed using one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc test. The results show that nulliparous women had no PCM defects. Par-pre, Par-post and POP groups showed varying rates of major PCM defects (7.7%, 16.7%, and 68.8% respectively). Minor ICM defects were present in all groups (21.4% (Nulli), 61.5% (Par-pre), 66.7% (Par-post), and 55.3% (POP)), but only the POP group had major defects (43.8%). The ICA was significantly sharper (p < 0.001) in the POP group compared to other groups. A decrease in pelvic floor support, assessed by PCM damage in supine and ICM damage and a sharper total ICA done in upright, was measured in the POP population, as compared to healthy women. Minor muscle defects were common across all groups, but major defects exclusively in POP patients. This fundamental insight on muscle quality adds to our anatomical knowledge on the occurrence of POP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.