ArticleScientific reports2026
Exploration of potential biomarkers in salivary duct carcinoma based on bioinformatics analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evolving Concepts in Salivary Duct Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Salivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive malignant tumor, with scarce reports on its pathogenesis and treatment methods. This study aims to explore the potential biomarkers of SDC. SDC cases were analyzed using Illumina microarrays, and Limma identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between cancer and normal tissues. An intersection of these DEGs with the differential genes from the GSE138581 dataset was obtained through Venn analysis to identify the core DEGs. The core DEGs were analyzed by search Tool for the retrieval of interacting genes/proteins (STRING) and cytoscape to identify the genes most related to the disease in SDC patients. Core genes were enriched with gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG); their pan-cancer implications and immune aspects were studied. Finally, the core DEGs were initially validated by immunohistochemistry in SDC samples. Fifty DEGs were found by exome sequencing, 3158 by the GSE138581 microarray. Thirteen common genes were identified by Venn analysis, and ten core genes, including Forkhead box M1 (FOXM1), collagen, type XI, alpha 1 (COL11A1), and neuron navigator 2 (NAV2), were selected. GO enrichment of core genes included positive regulation of calcium ion transport and ATPase activity, and KEGG analysis focused on related pathways. Expression was evaluated across 34 cancers from the TCGA database, and immune DEG Phosphoinositide-3-kinase regulatory subunit 5 (PIK3R5) was identified. The obtained DEGs were further validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Identifying the DEGs not only helps improve our understanding of SDC pathogenesis but also promises to identify potential biomarkers and new therapeutic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.