ArticleIrish veterinary journal2026
Bulk tank milk ELISA as screening test for Mycoplasma bovis: herd classification based on serology and PCR testing of different age groups.
Article in Irish veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herd-level infection status for Mycoplasma bovis is commonly assessed by detecting antibodies in bulk tank milk (BTM) samples. However, the association between BTM serology and active circulation of the pathogen at farm level remains largely unclear, in part because non-lactating animals, and particularly calves, fall outside this sampling strategy. This cross-sectional pilot study aimed to categorize 14 dairy herds based on the ID-screen BTM antibody ELISA for M. bovis, and compare those results with PCR testing and serology in adult cows, and PCR testing in youngstock and calves. Serum sample-to-positive percentage (S/P%) from adult cows was measured using the Bio K432 ELISA. Nasal swabs (NS) from adult cows, calves, and youngstock, and vaginal swabs (VS) from lactating cows, were pooled by age group and tested by PCR. Based on manufacturer’s guidelines and optimized cutoff values for the ID-screen ELISA, herds were categorized as BTM negative (S/P% <30%; n = 5), BTM positive (S/P% ≥50%; n = 6) or BTM indeterminate (S/P% 30–50%; n = 3). Median serum S/P% was 26.3 (Interquartile range (IQR); 15.9–42.4), 81.33 (IQR; 52.7-108.8) and 43.4 (IQR; 27.5–95.0) in BTM negative, positive and indeterminate herds, respectively. PCR detected M. bovis only in pooled NS samples from calves and youngstock in two BTM positive herds. Seroprevalence aligned with BTM results for positive and negative herds, but varied in indeterminate herds. BTM testing may serve as a valuable screening tool to distinguish herds likely free of M. bovis from those where additional testing of calves and youngstock is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.