ArticleScientific reports2026
Meta-learning for few-shot open task recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-resolution UAV imagery-based instance segmentation for automatic counting of rubber trees across phenological seasons.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current few-shot learning research often assumes predefined task configurations and evaluates under fixed N-way K-shot settings. In realistic deployments, the target configuration is unknown at training time, and both way and shot can differ from the training setup. We characterize this mismatch as a structural shift between training and test episodes and refer to the resulting evaluation as the open-task setting. Models must extrapolate to unseen structural combinations rather than interpolate within a fixed grid. We formalize three regimes that expose this structural generalization: cross-way and cross-shot, which we term single-dimensional changes because they vary way or shot alone, and cross-way-cross-shot, a two-dimensional change that varies both; we also consider a cross-domain extension. We propose Open-MAML, a lightweight enhancement of gradient-based meta-learning that integrates (i) dynamic classifier construction to expand or contract the final layer on the fly without retraining, (ii) an inner-loop learning rate adaptation rule that scales with task size to keep fast adaptation stable, and (iii) AdaDropBlock, a structured regularizer that improves robustness without architecture-specific tuning. Across extensive within-domain and cross-domain evaluations, Open-MAML consistently outperforms train-from-scratch, fine-tuning, and a strong metric baseline, achieving typical absolute accuracy gains of 1-7% under single-dimensional changes and 3-6% under two-dimensional changes. These results position open-task evaluation as a necessary complement to fixed-design benchmarks and provide a reproducible basis for studying structural generalization in few-shot learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.