ArticleScientific reports2026
Eye-sidedness does not drive differences in growth and maturation in the Indian halibut (Psettodes erumei) from the Western Arabian Gulf.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The Indian halibut Psettodes erumei (Family Psettodidae), a primitive lineage of flatfishes exhibiting both sinistral and dextral morphs, provides a unique model for examining the evolutionary significance of morphological asymmetry in flatfishes. This study tested whether eye-sidedness influences somatic growth, body shape, and reproductive traits in P. erumei from the western Arabian Gulf. A total of 215 individuals were collected between 2020 and 2022, with sinistral and dextral morphs occurring in near-equal proportions. Model selection based on Akaike weights revealed that sex, rather than eye-sidedness, was the primary factor influencing length-weight relationships and growth, with females attaining significantly larger asymptotic lengths. Eye-sidedness had no detectable effect on gonadosomatic index patterns or length at 50% maturity. While Procrustes regression detected statistically significant differences in body landmarks and semilandmarks between morphs, these differences were minor and likely biologically negligible. Overall, the results support the hypothesis that eye-sidedness in P. erumei does not confer a measurable evolutionary advantage and imply that differences in developmental mechanisms, rather than adaptive advantages, played a primary role in fixing directional asymmetry in most flatfish lineages. Future research into the molecular and developmental pathways governing eye-sidedness will be essential for understanding why the vast majority of flatfish species exhibit monomorphic asymmetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.