Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41547835›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

A qualitative study examining household context and parental perspectives on preschoolers' digital media use guidelines.

Anh Ly, Gina Dimitropoulos, Brae Anne McArthur, Julianna Watt, Emma Cullen, Sheri Madigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anh LyUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gina DimitropoulosUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brae Anne McArthurUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Julianna WattUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Emma CullenUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sheri MadiganUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. sheri.madigan@ucalgary.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that the uptake of pediatric guidelines for screen use is generally low, which highlights a need to better understand the familial factors shaping children’s digital media use. This study aimed to explore parents’ perspectives regarding digital media use guidelines, including the factors that influence adherence to recommendations.

methodsSemi-structured interviews with 28 parents of young children were analyzed using thematic analysis. Purposive and snowball sampling were employed to recruit parents through notices posted at grocery stores, libraries, preschools, and a university database.

resultsThree overarching themes emerged: (1) influences and variations on digital media use in families; (2) views regarding guidelines; and (3) recommendations for disseminating and improving uptake of guidelines. Sub-themes included parental attitudes, family context, child characteristics, lack of information, parenting stress, and knowledge dissemination strategies.

conclusionsParental views regarding guidelines are shaped by personal attitudes, family context, child characteristics, availability of information, and societal influences. Recommendations include highlighting the developmental impacts on children, the effects of different types of screen activities, and strategies for limiting digital media use. Dissemination of information should use a multi-faceted approach that involves different sectors such as health and education, providing follow-up assessments, and building supportive environments.

Indexed as

Digital MediaGuidelines as TopicParentsAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMedia ExposureQualitative ResearchScreen TimeDigital devicesDigital media useDigital media use guidelinesEarly childhoodParental perspectivesQualitative researchSemi-structured interviews

Identifiers

PMID41547835
PMCPMC12895794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.