ArticleBMC medical education2026
Challenging content: a mixed-methods evaluation of a novel sexual health curriculum in doctor of physical therapy education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite its importance to patients, sexual health is often overlooked by healthcare providers. Failure to address patients’ sexual healthcare needs may stem from inadequate health professions education. Physical therapists and physical therapy students are among the healthcare providers who may be unprepared to address sexual health in their clinical role. This paper examines a novel approach to teaching physical therapy students to address sexual health and makes recommendations for future curricular design and delivery.
methodsThis study employed a convergent, parallel mixed methods design to evaluate the longitudinal impacts of a novel, evidence-based curriculum delivered in 2023 and 2024, which was developed to improve physical therapy students’ readiness to address sexual health. The curriculum was student-centered, grounded in prior research, incorporated relevant conceptual frameworks, and infused the lived experience of a patient-educator. Quantitative data were collected using the Students’ Attitudes Towards Addressing Sexual Health (SA-SH) questionnaire at three timepoints: pre-intervention, post-intervention, and post-clinical education. A mixed-effects linear model was used to evaluate changes over time. Qualitative data were collected via six semi-structured focus groups and analyzed using directed content analysis informed by a conceptual framework.
resultsA total of 137 students participated across two cohorts. Least squares means (± standard error) for the SA-SH total score were 74.0 (± 1.0) at baseline, 82.8 (± 1.0) post-intervention, and 82.5 (± 1.1) at 10-month post-clinical follow-up. Mixed model results indicated SA-SH scores increased significantly and meaningfully from baseline to post-intervention (estimated mean difference = 8.7, 95% CI 7.7 to 10.4) and were maintained over the 10-month follow-up. Focus group themes supported the quantitative findings, highlighting increased awareness of the PT’s role in sexual health and perceived gains in communication confidence. Integration of data sources reinforced the effectiveness of the intervention and identified areas for continued curricular development.
conclusionsThe results obtained in this study indicate that physical therapy students can benefit from brief yet thoughtfully planned educational interventions to support their self-perceived readiness to address sexual health in clinical practice. Recommendations for educators to further improve curricula include baseline and post-education assessments, incorporation of lived experiences, and attention to the personal and interpersonal factors that influence healthcare providers’ approach to addressing sexual health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.