Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41547792›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Psoas muscle mass measurement in assessment of imminent fracture risk after vertebral fracture: a single-center case-control study.

Chenyu Jiang, Yali Li, Mengze Zhang, Dan Jin, Suwei Liu, Huishu Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chenyu JiangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yali LiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Mengze ZhangThe Institute of Intelligent Diagnostics, Beijing United-Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Dan JinDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Suwei LiuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huishu YuanDepartment of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. huishuy@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing New Health Industry Development Foundation XM2020-02-006National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171927the Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7212126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the predictive value of CT value and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the psoas muscle at the L3 level for imminent fracture risk after vertebral fracture and compare with quantitative CT based finite element analysis (QCT-FEA) and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measurement. MATERIALS &

methodsForty patients with imminent fractures following prior thoracolumbar fragility fractures and fifty-one matched controls without re-fracture during at least a two-year follow-up were retrospectively identified from administrative databases. The CT value and the CSA of the psoas muscle at L3 levels were measured with baseline CT images. Additionally, QCT-FEA was performed to estimate the vertebral bone strength of L1 and measured the vBMD. The predictive values of these factors were assessed using logistic regression analysis and ROC curves.

resultsPatients with imminent fractures had significantly lower psoas muscle CSA (669.5 ± 188.1 vs. 904.2 ± 189.7 mm², P < 0.001), vBMD (65.6 ± 19.6 vs. 78.5 ± 16.0 mg/cm³, P = 0.001), and FE-vertebral strength (564.5 ± 329.9 vs. 783.9 ± 225.6 N, P < 0.001) than controls, while no difference was observed in psoas muscle mean CT value (P = 0.210). Psoas CSA emerged as the strongest independent predictor of imminent fracture (adjusted OR = 5.0, 95%CI: 2.5–11.3, P < 0.001), outperforming vBMD (adjusted OR = 2.2, 95%CI: 1.4–3.8) and FE-vertebral strength (adjusted OR = 2.7, 95%CI: 1.6–4.9). ROC analysis confirmed psoas CSA had the highest AUC among single parameters (0.812, 95%CI: 0.724–0.901), and the combination of psoas CSA and FE-vertebral strength achieved the optimal predictive performance (AUC = 0.866). Stratified analysis in females validated these findings, with psoas CSA showing an even stronger association (adjusted OR = 8.6, 95%CI: 3.4–29.4) and higher AUC (0.850).

conclusionL3 psoas muscle CSA is an independent and superior predictor of imminent fracture risk in patients with prior vertebral fractures compared to QCT-FEA-derived vertebral strength and vBMD. Combining psoas CSA with FE-vertebral strength further enhances predictive efficiency.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Osteoporotic FracturesPsoas MusclesSpinal FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsComputer tomographyFinite element analysisFracture riskOsteoporosisSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID41547792
PMCPMC12896043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.