SynthesisBMC medicine2026
The impact of e-cigarette taxation: a systematic review and meta-analysis on usage, pricing strategies, and public health implications.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundE-cigarette taxation has been increasingly implemented worldwide as a fiscal and regulatory tool to curb consumption, generate revenue, and mitigate public health risks. However, the effectiveness of such policies remains uncertain, particularly given differences in tax structures, market dynamics, and consumer behaviors. This study systematically reviews and synthesizes evidence on the impact of e-cigarette taxation on governments, businesses, and consumers.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, seven electronic databases and grey literature sources were utilized to identify relevant studies. Eligible studies included quantitative research on e-cigarette taxation policies. Data synthesis involved a narrative summary focusing on tax pass-through rates and elasticity. Meta-analysis calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) for e-cigarette usage between tax and no tax groups. Quality assessment was conducted using JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists.
resultsA total of 27 studies were included. The meta-analysis based on three US studies suggested a modest reduction in e-cigarette use among adults (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94) and youth aged 18-24 (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.78-0.98). Notable heterogeneity in tax elasticity was observed, ranging from - 0.62 to - 0.02, suggesting inelastic demand in some cases. Limited evidence suggested that e-cigarette taxation can increase fiscal revenue, although the absolute amount remains small compared with traditional tobacco excise revenue. The pass-through rate ranged from 0.07 in China to 1.67 in the USA, highlighting differences in company pricing strategies and market responses. The ad valorem taxes had a lower pass-through rate and higher effect than specific taxes.
conclusionsE-cigarette taxation impacts prices, sales, and consumption variably, influenced by tax policy specifics, market conditions, and stakeholder behavior. Coordinated tax design, aligned with broader regulatory and educational measures, is essential to enhance policy effectiveness and protect public health.
trial registrationProspero Registration Number CRD42023395112.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.