Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41547740›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Views on HPV-vaccination held by parents of Turkish and Moroccan origin in the Netherlands: an exploratory study using Q-methodology.

Enise Çayci, Thijs van den Broek, Anna P Nieboer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enise ÇayciDepartment of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. cayci@eshpm.eur.nl.
Thijs van den BroekDepartment of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna P NieboerDepartment of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek IIW.1154.23.166
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth disparities between people with and without a migration background remain a persistent issue across Europe, with individuals from non-European immigrant backgrounds often experiencing particularly negative outcomes. These populations also face higher risks of infection-related cancers, including those caused by Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Vaccination programs have the potential to mitigate such disparities. In the Netherlands, this potential is undermined by the low uptake among certain groups, especially individuals of Turkish and Moroccan origin, who represent two of the largest non-European ethnic minorities in the country. The underlying reasons for this low uptake are rarely explored in depth. This study, therefore, focuses on parents of Turkish and Moroccan origin living in the Netherlands, exploring their perspectives on HPV vaccination for their children aged 7 to 9 years. Building on the Health Belief Model, the study also considers how potentially gendered norms and expectations may influence parents’ attitudes toward vaccinating sons versus daughters.

methodsQ-methodology, a research technique that combines qualitative and quantitative methods to systematically study people's subjective viewpoints, was used to gain insights into parents' perspectives on HPV vaccination. 29 parents of Turkish or Moroccan origin in the Netherlands with children aged 7–9 were asked to rank 30 statements based on the Health Belief Model between April 2024 and January 2025. After ranking the statements, respondents were asked to explain the reasoning behind their rankings. By-factor analysis was used to identify distinct perspectives. The qualitative material was used to verify and refine the interpretation of the perspectives.

resultsThree distinct perspectives were identified: 1. “Distrust, Uncertainty and Negative experiences as Barriers to Vaccination”, 2. HPV-Specific Vaccine Hesitancy: Concerns About Early-Age Vaccination and Necessity, and 3. Vaccination as key to preventing HPV-related disease.

conclusionThis study highlights the diversity of parental perspectives on HPV vaccination within Turkish and Moroccan communities in the Netherlands. While some parents support HPV vaccination as a preventive measure, others express great hesitancy. The root of this hesitancy differs somewhat between subgroups of vaccine-hesitant parents of Turkish and Moroccan origin. These findings underscore the need for tailored communication strategies to support informed decision-making and improve vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsVaccinationAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMoroccoNetherlandsQualitative ResearchTurkeyPapillomavirus VaccinesEthnic minoritiesGenderHPVQ methodologyVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID41547740
PMCPMC12895906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.